Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 22:11:44 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: suggestion for camcontrol Message-ID: <20000917221144.A51411@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009171303100.96334-100000@beppo.feral.com>; from mjacob@feral.com on Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 01:03:40PM -0700 References: <20000908161550.A21933@panzer.kdm.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009171303100.96334-100000@beppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 01:03:40PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 14:54:09 -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > The points about cleanliness are worthy- except the deal here is that the > > > interfaces have to be clean. The program 'camcontrol devlist' does not. > > > > Interfaces don't "have" to be clean, and neither does code that accesses > > those interfaces. > > > > Cleanliness is a choice made by the developer, and in this case I'm chosing > > the clean path rather than the quick-n-dirty path. > > > > The information in question is available through 'camcontrol negotiate -v', > > (once I commit the patch) so I don't think there's an urgent need for this, > > anyway. We've got time to do this the right way instead of throwing > > something in there that will likely stay there a long time. > > I wasn't paying attention - was this integrated? I think Ken is looking for a clean way to do this and has put it on his whiteboard as a wish. Could be wrong though.. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000917221144.A51411>