Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:23:46 -0500 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: De-orbit Allwinner A10/A20/A31 for 12.0 Message-ID: <CACNAnaHXRYCpEyeXaUEZf2Fr=faP%2B7MdCVpyyxMROd%2BtWd4%2BcQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180619121006.GB69230@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <20180612223248.f95d9ce3961187576e220614@bidouilliste.com> <CANCZdfpP_XNh_Vwsq2XSiy-WPSJZ7ZETRjMmb609Xam%2BtYmawQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180619121006.GB69230@cicely7.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:43:52PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> I have all these boards... >> >> But they are getting old and nearly are unobtanium these days. Were it not >> for the clocks thing, they'd be fine to run -current (I have a slightly pre >> new clock version running on a couple of boards). I think I'm with you: we >> need a maintainer who has done the work to bring them up to date, or they >> need to go. > > Would be sad to see A20 go, it was such a popular SoC and I own a couple > of boards with them, but I also don't have the time to help maintaining the > code. Hi, Consider A20 off the chopping block- I want my Banana Pi R1 to eventually be useful, so I added some basic clock support and we should boot on these things again. A10 probably won't go away unless we actually have reported problems- it's a similar enough SoC to the A20 that all of the clocks currently implemented should be the same between the two based on my reading of the documentation. I don't actually have any A10-based boards, though, so I can't volunteer to explicitly maintain/test it. Thanks, Kyle Evans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaHXRYCpEyeXaUEZf2Fr=faP%2B7MdCVpyyxMROd%2BtWd4%2BcQ>