From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Oct 29 15:27:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445C9A21DD7; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6081418; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65EBD1FE023; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:27:08 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: svn commit: r290003 - head/sys/ofed/include/linux To: Gleb Smirnoff References: <201510261328.t9QDSYRT076892@repo.freebsd.org> <56302F9D.2020308@freebsd.org> <56308289.4050902@selasky.org> <20151029143651.GN97830@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Julian Elischer , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <56323B33.8020505@selasky.org> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:28:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151029143651.GN97830@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:27:14 -0000 On 10/29/15 15:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: >> The LinuxKPI is not a binary compatibility module, and will at some > H> point have API's diverging from Linux, to fit BSD API's better. > > This statement makes the name of LinuxKPI quite pointless, as well > as the whole idea of the KPI unclear. Hi, To be more clear. Adding bind_irq_to_cpu() is more an exception than the default. A the moment I think Linux doesn't have an equivalent of this function, because of Linux's interrupt model. --HPS