From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 19:01:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E5D16A46F; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0269A13C48A; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l58IVlmR085246; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:31:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l58IVl58085243; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:31:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:31:47 -0700 (PDT) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Oliver Fromme In-Reply-To: <200706081547.l58FlEsb084443@lurza.secnetix.de> Message-ID: <20070608113000.E85226@ns1.feral.com> References: <200706081547.l58FlEsb084443@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can anybody terminate an IP-IP tunnel for me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:01:16 -0000 > I've used OpenVPN myself to tunnel official IP addresses > to my (dynamic) DSL link at home. You need to have a > server outside somewhere, of course, but that shouldn't I find that vtun is a pretty reliable and less heavyweight solution for this- I use it to get a tunnel to a secondary lab of mine (at my mom's house) which only has dynamic IP. The only problem here is that this isn't a solution for providing routing for somebody else's Class C block. -matt