From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Oct 6 22:30:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA27879 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:30:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA27873; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Message-Id: <199710070530.WAA27873@hub.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@FreeBSD.ORG, nsayer@quack.kfu.com Received: from quack.kfu.com (0@quack.kfu.com [204.147.226.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA27557 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:23:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nsayer@quack.kfu.com) Received: from morpheus.kfu.com (morpheus.kfu.com [204.147.226.4]) by quack.kfu.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA20783 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by morpheus.kfu.com (8.8.5//ident-1.0) id WAA05623; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199710070523.WAA05623@morpheus.kfu.com> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:23:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Reply-To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: kern/4717: si driver names tty lines oddly Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 4717 >Category: kern >Synopsis: si driver names tty lines oddly >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Oct 6 22:30:01 PDT 1997 >Last-Modified: >Originator: Nick Sayer >Organization: just me >Release: FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE i386 >Environment: si0 >Description: Specialix has a rather odd habit of misnaming the pins on their serial ports. They come from the point of view that presumes that they are providing DCE ports to connect to terminals. This is exactly backwards from the traditional viewpoint. Thus, sicontrol mstate will say that RTS is asserted, when it really means that CTS is asserted. Same with DTR/DSR. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: This should either be documented as a heavy warning on the si or sicontrol man page or the labels changed. >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: