From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 20 00:00:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F70337B401 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F00C43F75 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:00:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5K70d1f007050; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:00:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h5K70dlw007049; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:00:39 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h5K6tlHh035496; Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:55:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200306200655.h5K6tlHh035496@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Terry Lambert In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Jun 2003 22:58:46 PDT." <3EF2A296.3C08D243@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:55:47 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO,PLING_QUERY, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Congratulations Terry! (was: Re: Meta: explain what where when?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 07:00:41 -0000 Terry Lambert writes: > > I'm too amazed by this to even comment on the above quoted > > paragraph. > > I'll comment: you are obviously not as fanatically dedicated > to FreeBSD as I am, and you are apparently counting -chat > postings. Why does having less postings than you make him less dedicated? Why do you consider this obvious? Why is counting chat@ in the set of "FreeBSD mailing lists" worthy of mention? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH