From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 18 19:32:31 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E396A10656D1
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:32:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320B88FC12
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5IJWM8b054233;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5IJWMvX054230; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: "Robison, Dave" <david.robison@fisglobal.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FDF8054.9030906@fisglobal.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182129440.45874@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <4FCF9C07.2000607@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206172212440.2506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf3upvdc34t2sn@tech304>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181749160.78762@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf3wd8vf34t2sn@tech304>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181829210.99007@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAHhngE0eLR9PEoyn2TLuV7+z7NtsHMgdsj6YbSm3ZQijDxTNjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FDF8054.9030906@fisglobal.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:32:32 -0000

> GPL runs contrary to the nature and intent of the BSD style license.
> Free and open software benefits us all.

True. GPL is definitely not FREE software. Freedom doesn't have different 
types. Something is free or it is not free.

GPL software is not free as i can not do whatever i want with it.

>
> Getting rid of GPL is a good thing, and well worth any (debatable)

I fully agree. So why all this lies about much higher performance and 
others?

I don't consider CLANG to be a great success. I consider it acceptable 
replacement of GCC.

i just hate hype and lies. ALWAYS.