Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: "Robison, Dave" <david.robison@fisglobal.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182129440.45874@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FDF8054.9030906@fisglobal.com> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <4FCF9C07.2000607@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206172212440.2506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf3upvdc34t2sn@tech304> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181749160.78762@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <op.wf3wd8vf34t2sn@tech304> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181829210.99007@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAHhngE0eLR9PEoyn2TLuV7%2Bz7NtsHMgdsj6YbSm3ZQijDxTNjw@mail.gmail.com> <4FDF8054.9030906@fisglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> GPL runs contrary to the nature and intent of the BSD style license. > Free and open software benefits us all. True. GPL is definitely not FREE software. Freedom doesn't have different types. Something is free or it is not free. GPL software is not free as i can not do whatever i want with it. > > Getting rid of GPL is a good thing, and well worth any (debatable) I fully agree. So why all this lies about much higher performance and others? I don't consider CLANG to be a great success. I consider it acceptable replacement of GCC. i just hate hype and lies. ALWAYS.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182129440.45874>