From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 13 20:42:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FA316A4CE; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:42:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D61E43D46; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:42:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a180.otenet.gr [212.205.215.180]) j0DKfx8a004254; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:42:01 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0DKfsXT000849; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:41:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0DKfsel000848; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:41:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:41:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: John-Mark Gurney Message-ID: <20050113204154.GA829@gothmog.gr> References: <20050113153228.GG49329@submonkey.net> <200501131849.j0DInEEE029957@gw.catspoiler.org> <20050113185323.GI49329@submonkey.net> <20050113190755.GA24939@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20050113193413.GL19624@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050113193413.GL19624@funkthat.com> cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: Ceri Davies cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/security 100.chksetuid X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:42:08 -0000 On 2005-01-13 11:34, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote this message on Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 21:07 +0200: > > > Sounds like something like chksetuid_exclude which lists mountpoints to > > > exclude might be in order. Any objections to me putting that together, > > > or are people happy with the status quo? > > > > It's not a bad idea. While you're at it, a knob that disables checks > > for NFS-mounted filesystems may be nice too. It doesn't make sense to > > check the same files both in the client *and* the server, as Don has > > pointed out. > > > > I think I can almost see this coming :-) > > > > daily_status_security_chksetuid_nfs="NO" > > Why not do something like: > daily_status_security_chksetuid_remote="NO" > > Find already has "logic" that tries to determin if an fs is local or > remote.. That sounds even better! :-)