From owner-freebsd-security Tue Apr 17 11:25:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [64.0.106.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D0F37B422 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:25:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scanner@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (scanner@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA38269; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:25:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:25:21 -0400 (EDT) From: To: Crist Clark Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: non-random IP IDs In-Reply-To: <3ADC8368.C96550FE@globalstar.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [CC trimmed because most dont need to see personal opinions...] > Personally, I like (b). It's right there for those who want it, but > the bloat-watchers don't have to see that extra few bytes going to > kernelland. I vote for (b) as well. As one person who sees to much crap in a base install that a user has no control over. I prefer to have someone opt-in to bloating then force it on someone. As far as technical merrit which is better I leave that to the person(s) implementing the code. Ahhh I remember 2.1 days when my kernel's were ~700K :) ============================================================================= -Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek Work: scanner@jurai.net | Open Systems Inc., Wellington, Kansas Home: scanner@deceptively.shady.org | http://open-systems.net ============================================================================= WINDOWS: "Where do you want to go today?" LINUX: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" BSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" ============================================================================= irc.openprojects.net #FreeBSD -Join the revolution! ICQ: 20016186 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message