Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 19:32:58 +0100 From: Simon Barner <barner@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: secteam@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit "forgot" 2006 vulnerabilities Message-ID: <20070103183258.GA67537@dose.local.invalid> In-Reply-To: <20070103142305.GA84623@outcold.yadt.co.uk> References: <20070103142305.GA84623@outcold.yadt.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Taylor wrote: > Whilst catching up with the daily run and security run e-mails > >from the past few days, I noticed the portaudit database was restarted > at the beginning of the year. Is this the expected behaviour? >=20 > Now I still have vulnerable ports (with problems from last year which, > until Monday, were faithfully reported to me every week), but get the > message: >=20 > # portaudit -Fa > auditfile.tbz 100% of 5693 B 27 kBps > New database installed. > 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. Same here... --=20 Best regards / Viele Gr=FC=DFe, barner@FreeBSD.= org Simon Barner barner@gmx.de --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFm/bZCkn+/eutqCoRAogeAKD789OREHd9qQxEATbmNhixLmWRSwCgtp07 2cqwFIsOB+wYWFcL3hd6PBE= =OWe6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070103183258.GA67537>