From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 12 14:27:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D168337B401; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k6.locore.ca (k6.locore.ca [198.96.117.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F5643FB1; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:27:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: from k6.locore.ca (localhost.locore.ca [127.0.0.1]) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4CLRVxw000191; Mon, 12 May 2003 17:27:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jake@k6.locore.ca) Received: (from jake@localhost) by k6.locore.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4CKbKYh001261; Mon, 12 May 2003 16:37:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 16:37:20 -0400 From: Jake Burkholder To: Hiten Pandya Message-ID: <20030512203720.GA1103@locore.ca> References: <200305121815.h4CIFXji016401@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030512202616.GA16407@perrin.int.nxad.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030512202616.GA16407@perrin.int.nxad.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: Maxime Henrion cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/fxp if_fxpreg.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 21:27:40 -0000 Apparently, On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Hiten Pandya said words to the effect of; > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:15:33AM -0700, Maxime Henrion wrote: > > mux 2003/05/12 11:15:33 PDT > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/dev/fxp if_fxpreg.h > > Log: > > Fix the unaligned access problems that some people saw on alpha > > by using a __packed keyword for the fxp_rfa structure. The Intel > > guys who designed this structure with unaligned fields deserve > > to be shot. > > I was telling on along, that use my BUS_SPACE_DEBUG patches, but > nah, no one wanted to listen! 8-) 8-) 8-) > Note, I am not making any indirect towards mux, but just > in general! > > If people want, I can update my BUS_SPACE_DEBUG patches: > > http://people.FreeBSD.ORG/~hmp/olddiffs/bus_space_debug.patch.gz This doesn't help because the structures aren't accessed with bus_space. Jake