From owner-freebsd-qa Thu Nov 21 15:52:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0D537B401; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9377C43E3B; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:52:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with SMTP id gALNqoBF020555; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:52:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:52:50 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: David Yeske Cc: qa@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs install option questions In-Reply-To: <20021105224412.42014.qmail@web13508.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In terms of where to take this: there are many reported problems with smbfs on 5.0-CURRENT. It's not clear whether this is left over from the KSE imports, the Apple-derived fixes that might not have fixed things, etc. In any case, before we can look at smbfs install, we really need smbfs working. People who feel moved to debug this should feel free :-). Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, David Yeske wrote: > I got a smbfs install option working a while ago before drivers.flp came around, but there was no > space on the floppies. Since drivers.flp came out, there is more space. I was wondering how I > should go about making this usable, and which files should be on kern.flp, mfsroot.flp, > drivers.flp, or somewhere else. Also I am generally looking for feedback... > > The following patch is NOT up to date though. The diff to GENERIC is NOT implying I think GENERIC > should be modifed. I did that just to have those things added to GENERIC so they would make it > onto BOOTMFS. The smbfs install option is based of the nfs install option, but it does not use > dns. > > http://pigseye.kennesaw.edu/~dyeske/freebsd/smbfs_current.patch > > http://pigseye.kennesaw.edu/~dyeske/freebsd/smbfs.c > > > Regards, > David Yeske > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now > http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message