From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 13:26:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD833106564A for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mehulc87@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDCE8FC1E for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mehulc87@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so7587634rvf.43 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:26:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=MFAXWKIHJVpqIpDwaPtmyaSsYF0illSEGGfBRaSi744=; b=GRTWSIIyOkegw/lD227wdfG0xZgFlrrkrUUOS8beb6ElYhFQeUESG5P9FmYswjN2Aa p6L7mrHnjz8mntLNftjuk7RAG3JxTVLl8neqhVIPNISCW6Lnv0IH3mkwhrce8mNNkTRC wU7c2LXMybdmvC7T/EI9guiIhKefXCJpnMi4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Bt//gIlFVodGVPbdOeq3LwPc3OJTvSqgqS6sVKcrkoaID+gmW5F9hS1oTGpMirxJqb wAdu2Um5nNvVxisnbA3AQJ/u9z1kfMcuKOdUwPC370prQZdsVK+qd8AkU52ENSjQHPNy gaanXoChBoYAP+tEIG83LN+s686lpnKmrIqe4= Received: by 10.143.18.16 with SMTP id v16mr7334332wfi.142.1230902802328; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:26:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.110.4 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:26:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <251d650c0901020526w53a210f9xc1987f5eaa9c175d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 18:56:42 +0530 From: "Mehul Chadha" To: "Michel Talon" In-Reply-To: <20090102125444.GA55765@lpthe.jussieu.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20090102125444.GA55765@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD kernel Debugging tools for Virtual Memory Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:26:43 -0000 Michel Talon Wrote: > Do you mean like vkernel in DragonFlyBSD? Yes, UML and vkernel cater to same problem the implementation being the obvious difference between them. We have implemented some part of it and working on the design of the rest. We have been following the vkernel and UML and trying to move away with some of the shortcomings in both. It will be helpful for us if we can have some valuable inputs or any advice from your side. Regards, Mehul On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Michel Talon wrote: > Mehul Chadha wrote: > > > But I am working on a virtual > > mode freebsd project similar to what UML does in linux. > > Do you mean like vkernel in DragonFlyBSD? > http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man/?command=vkernel§ion=ANY > > > -- > > Michel TALON > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >