From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 11:46:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E02B97 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5AD8FC08 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA14855 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:46:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <50C9C012.8020306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:46:26 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: ng_ether naming X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:46:29 -0000 ng_ether uses if_xname for naming its nodes. This could be troublesome for mapping interface names to their ng_ether companions in the face of interface renaming capability. Especially given that interface renaming and ng_ether _module_ loading may happen in an arbitrary order. I am not sure how to solve this best. One possibility is to use if_dname+if_dunit combination for ng_ether naming. This should be stable and available for querying. This behavior should also be backward compatible with ng_ether being compiled into kernel (if_dname+if_dunit == if_xname before any renaming could occur). Another possibility is to do ng_ether renaming when its interface is renamed. This seems nicer but appears to be more work and more intrusive, because interfaces would have to know about their ng_ether nodes. What do you think? Thank you. And just in case: $ ifconfig -l net0 lo0 $ ngctl list There are 2 total nodes: Name: re0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 0 Name: ngctl11353 Type: socket ID: 00000003 Num hooks: 0 -- Andriy Gapon