From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 20 09:08:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400D31065675; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary@velocity-servers.net) Received: from longhorn.velocity-servers.net (longhorn.velocity-servers.net [65.99.246.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278148FC1B; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary@velocity-servers.net) Received: from pool-70-106-59-217.hag.east.verizon.net ([70.106.59.217] helo=dragoon.velocity-servers.net) by longhorn.velocity-servers.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JcGkv-000OAM-P4; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 04:08:13 -0500 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:08:11 -0400 To: Roman Divacky , Alexander Leidinger From: Gary Stanley In-Reply-To: <20080320085122.GB32936@freebsd.org> References: <96317980@ipt.ru> <20080319204521.GA98846@freebsd.org> <20080320080703.ws5h2vaqskkw4w0s@webmail.leidinger.net> <20080320085122.GB32936@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - longhorn.velocity-servers.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [26 6] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - velocity-servers.net Message-Id: <20080320090815.278148FC1B@mx1.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: additional futex operations X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:08:15 -0000 At 04:51 AM 3/20/2008, Roman Divacky wrote: >On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:07:03AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Roman Divacky (from Wed, 19 Mar 2008 > > 21:45:21 +0100): > > > > > > > >can you guys please test: > > > > > > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/futex_private_pi.patch > > > > > >especially if linux-firefox is still broken with this patch. > > > > What do you think about rate limiting (only one) the FD case instead > > of hiding it completely (and using the content of the comment as the > > message to print with a little bit of "only report if something is > > obviously broken")? This way we could determine if we need it for > > linux-backwards compatibility. > >I dont think the FD case is used widely and we correctly (now) return >ENOSYS so no problems should be here. > >Also.. if anyone is willing/able to implement the FD backing I think such >person is skilled enough to see what is the problem even without the printf. >It can only confuse normal people I think.. > >I'd let it be as it is I think it should be commented out and not rate limited. If nothing else, just add another #define for FUTEX_DEBUG and enable it if DEBUG is defined in the kernel. -G