From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 12 16:48:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5035516A4BF for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao03.cox.net (lakemtao03.cox.net [68.1.17.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5F743FE5 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:48:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from kongemord.krig.net ([68.100.111.121]) by lakemtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20030912234851.AGW9576.lakemtao03.cox.net@kongemord.krig.net> for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:48:51 -0400 Received: by kongemord.krig.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:48:52 -0400 From: "Bob Hall" Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:48:52 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030912234851.GA5349@kongemord.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3564C5C1ABA7934FB00B98936C699B05B462BF@exch2000.silogcaen.fr> <20030912065823.GB9763@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030912100537.GB89839@ei.bzerk.org> <200309120618.05357.tbstep@tampabay.rr.com> <3F62382A.5000903@liwing.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F62382A.5000903@liwing.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Software patents X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:48:54 -0000 On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:18:34PM +0000, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Todd Stephens wrote: > But if any algorithm used in bsd will be patented in europe and > the patent became valid, they may have a problem either. I don't know about Europe, but if the algorithm existed in *BSD prior to the patent, that would be "prior art", and it would invalidate the patent. Given the way changes have been introduced into the code base in the various BSDs, there shouldn't be any problem documenting that BSD had it first. The problem is not on things that already exist; they can generally be documented. The problem is granting patents on trivial improvements, like "one click shopping". Patent law was never intended to protect that sort of thing. Bob Hall