From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 30 16:44:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id 25A5E37B401; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:44:54 -0700 From: Juli Mallett To: Julian Elischer Cc: FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: signal changes Message-ID: <20020930164453.A51410@FreeBSD.org> References: <20020930163403.A50643@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from julian@elischer.org on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 04:39:26PM -0700 Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Alternate-Addresses: , , , , X-Towel: Yes X-LiveJournal: flata, jmallett X-Negacore: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * De: Julian Elischer [ Data: 2002-09-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ] > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > * De: Julian Elischer [ Data: 2002-09-30 ] > > [ Subjecte: Re: signal changes ] > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: > > > > > > > > What limits are the on the number of signals that are stored? > > > > > > > > It's a TailQ. > > > > > > Surely there is a limit or it would be a DOS candidate. > > > > What kind of limit would you like? I can't afford the relevant standards > > or I'd check to see if there was a standard one. I could add a sysctl > > tunable? > > I don't know what standard would be relevant.. > what standard would specify how many signals you could stack up? Teh same that provides specification for queued signals - posix rts. -- Juli Mallett | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger jmallett@FreeBSD.org http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jmallett/ | Support my FreeBSD hacking! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message