From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Mar 16 11:37:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669EAAD1017 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1mail2513.mymailbank.co.uk (UK1MAIL2513-PERMANET.IE.mymailbank.co.uk [217.69.47.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE40C1980 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (UnknownHost [88.151.27.41]) by uk1mail2513-d.mymailbank.co.uk with SMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ag9lR-000FgK-E8; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? Message-Id: <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.3 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:45 -0000 On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:40 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:55:16 +1100, Chris Hope wrote: > > As pre-purchase research I'm looking to buy a $500-800(AUD) DEC Alpha > > 64bit home desktop workstation circa 1998-2001. > > > > What is the latest kernel 64bit either internal project or recommended > > fork that supports it (with KDE/Gnome 1 or similar UI). > > I'd say that the current production release FreeBSD/ia64 10.2 ia64 is Itanium, that's not going to run on an Alpha. > Otherwise, check out FreeBSD/alpha, but keen in mind this > branch has been discontinued: > > https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/alpha.html That should do - but it is ancient, ports are likely to be troublesome. NetBSD may be a better option. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith