From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 10:04:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D341065673 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) Received: from acme.spoerlein.net (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51308FC0A for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (acme.spoerlein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:23c2::1]) by acme.spoerlein.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0UA40Jg035583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:04:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uqs@spoerlein.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=spoerlein.net; s=dkim200908; t=1296381840; bh=19ng8djgeIY3wPjcWHxiYzqHaubTIAHMhSQQHei0p5w=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=aUoIGU0zsXqH05jkgK5AgV4NbwUJQe3xGdQmBsJFt45jpgWN74dWRxFbAjRnDEs4c 8DbTpMSp2pU15aX2+mD+N3A2G8l4F0O9chZJUbntsKtDShgT6GwIJzhP8sYPw54kqy LOUx7+Z2e7RS+0a7gD3gloMqiBz6Nh8HFV5nGrj4= Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:04:00 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110130100400.GC65811@acme.spoerlein.net> Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org References: <201101300331.p0U3Vl9t032850@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201101300331.p0U3Vl9t032850@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:04:02 -0000 [Picking a random tinderbox mail] As I've broken the powerpc64 build a couple of days ago, I was amazed that none of these emails went to my Inbox. Whenever the ports' INDEX build is broken, there's a list of committers that are most likely to blame for it. I would welcome the same type of emails from the tinderboxen; and it is really easy to generate this list, e.g.: if !exists(committers-on-the-hook) svn info -> record last non-broken revision fi svn up if !exists(committers-on-the-hook) svn info -> record new revision run svn log -rlast:new and store all login-names in committers-on-the-hook fi do the tinderbox if !error rm committers-on-the-hook else send build breakage to current@ send nastygrams to all committers-on-the-hook fi