From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 21 15:07:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61D316A4CF for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:07:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C6443D2D for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:07:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryan@confabulator.net) Received: (qmail 645 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2004 15:07:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.83?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 21 Nov 2004 15:07:17 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.197.24.213 Message-ID: <41A0CC7D.4010204@confabulator.net> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 09:12:29 -0800 From: "Ryan J. Cavicchioni" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20041120165059.DF29543D64@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20041120165923.GA73153@ozzmosis.com> <9395922d041121030126fc204e@mail.gmail.com> <20041121145839.GA22939@gargantuan.com> <20041121150546.GA88028@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <20041121150546.GA88028@ozzmosis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: turning off IPv6 support in BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:07:18 -0000 Isn't it supposed to be ipv6_enable="NONE" I could be wrong. andrew clarke wrote: >On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 09:58:39AM -0500, Michael W. Oliver wrote: > > > >>To get rid of IPv6 completely (why would you want this? :) ), you should >>definitely rebuild your kernel without INET6. >> >> > >I suppose it would be a good idea to remove IPv6 support from hosts on >IPv4-only intranets because it's then one less thing to worry about from >a security point of view. Plus, of course, marginally less overhead in >the kernel. > >Regards >Andrew >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >