Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:36:16 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: growfs Message-ID: <20010322203616.C566@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200103221956.MAA15736@usr06.primenet.com>; from tlambert@primenet.com on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 07:56:43PM %2B0000 References: <200103221253.JAA29879@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> <200103221956.MAA15736@usr06.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 07:56:43PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > It's called "fsresize" these days: > > > > > > http://www.nethelp.no/scsi/fsresize.c > > > > Mmmm... How is this related to: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=26529+28670+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-fs/20001210.freebsd-fs > > > > Are they different things? > > Same ecological niche. > > I think "growfs" is newer, which is why I picked it. > > I looked in the "man page searcher" at: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?manpath=FreeBSD+5.0-current > > Which apparently doesn't cover -current. It seems that growfs > in the -current source tree, however, according to my local CVS > mirror. > > I don't know how hard a compile it would be on an older version > of FreeBSD; if not hard, you'd think it would have been merged > back for the 4.3 release. The guys who wrote it did so under 4.1 so it should work fine :) Joe [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjq6Yj8ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBaYRwCeLHsuCb5VQ/etqywHCajMib7m 00gAoM2Dp26OTv9r9wGStcnBDbiiM3Zb =8lE7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010322203616.C566>