From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Sep 29 02:45:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6849CA0A0B5 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 02:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F291C1774 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 02:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id t8T2jeI0025326 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 20:45:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id t8T2jeqP025323; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 20:45:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 20:45:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ian Smith cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dd question In-Reply-To: <20150928010758.V29510@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Message-ID: References: <20150928010758.V29510@sola.nimnet.asn.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 20:45:40 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 02:45:42 -0000 On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Ian Smith wrote: > No, the memstick images have always been setup as an unsliced disk; Well, yes. I'd call it a "bare" bsdlabel or "dangerously dedicated". It's a bsdlabel partitioning format as they would have used before MBR existed. ... > gpart makes more sense of it, but I'm not sure whether gpart can be used > in 'dirty tricks' mode to create these. And I've no idea whether growfs > could do anything sensible about growing them; you could try. Warren? > > smithi on t23% gpart show da0 > => 0 15646720 da0 BSD (7.5G) > 0 5448528 1 freebsd-ufs (2.6G) > 5448528 10198192 - free - (4.9G) growfs is not something I use without severe provocation. At best, it leaves some things in their original locations. And some other utilities are surprised by that. Whether it will work with an installer image, who knows. I would probably use a separate bsdlabel partition if I was that desperate. The "how can I modify the FreeBSD install disk" question comes up often. It would be nice if we had something more accessible than 'make release'. mfsBSD (http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/) seems like a better basis for customization.