From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 16 20:11:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD5B16A468 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CC213C47E for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from [62.68.191.191] (helo=[172.16.0.43]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1HI9Q9-000AZs-BP; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:11:05 +0100 Message-ID: <45D60FD4.5010107@freemail.hu> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:11:00 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nagy_L=E1szl=F3_Zsolt?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Zaharchenko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <45D5D042.4000202@designaproduct.biz> <45D5D81E.1080700@joeholden.co.uk> <45D5E1BA.6010504@freemail.hu> <20070216192503.GA7827@shark.localdomain> <20070216192847.GA8358@shark.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070216192847.GA8358@shark.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Invisible process killing the CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:11:07 -0000 >> [ systat -vmstat 1 ] >> >>> Namei Name-cache Dir-cache 4960 prcfr >>> >> ^^^^ >> >> Looks like processes on this system are forking at a rate of 5000/sec. >> > > Ouch, that's pages freed by exiting processes, not process forks (gotta > get some sleep). Anyway, if this is persistent, then some processes are > exiting all the time, and they have to get created somehow, so the > scenario is the same... > Now the CPU is almost idle. :-) However, the prcfr value is still between 400 and 500. Is that normal? Laszlo