Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 22:36:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr@home.net> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hoek@hwcn.org Cc: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org, i.vaudrey@cableinet.co.uk, fports@jraynard.demon.co.uk Subject: Re: ports/4848: New Port to add! NASM Assembler Message-ID: <199710290336.WAA06905@istari.home.net> In-Reply-To: Mail from '"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>' dated: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 18:21:54 -0800
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> > > > 3) My personal opinion is that new ports are best submitted as an > > shar archive. This means that people can look over and review > > them when they're reading their FreeBSD-bugs mail. General > > agreement says that updates to existing ports should be done > > using recursive uni-diff. _Please_ be sure to note any new or > > removed files loudly. > > This is true. The few ports that I've committed from PRs have been > done this way. If a port is too large to be included as a shar > archive, it's probably also not done correctly. :-) Are you saying that those of us with new ports sitting in the queue should resubmit them as shar files? Will that help to get them processed? -SR
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710290336.WAA06905>