From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jul 30 04:55:52 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id EAA05326
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:55:52 -0700
Received: from crash.cts.com (crash.cts.com [192.188.72.17])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id EAA05318
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:55:50 -0700
Received: from io.cts.com by crash.cts.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.29.1 #5) id m0scWy1-0001YwC; Sun, 30 Jul 95 04:55 PDT
Received: (from root@localhost) by io.cts.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id EAA01318; Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:55:40 -0700
From: Morgan Davis <root@io.cts.com>
Message-Id: <199507301155.EAA01318@io.cts.com>
Subject: Re: Clunky telnet/rlogin performance
To: gibbs@freefall.cdrom.com (Justin T. Gibbs)
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 1995 04:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: cml@aureus.mother.com, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199507300821.BAA27625@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Jul 30, 95 01:21:57 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 435       
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Justin T. Gibbs writes:
> 
> Much easier fix:
> 
> vi /etc/sysconfig
>
> tcp_extensions=NO
> 
> If this does fix the problem, I'd like to know why.  Is BSDI's implementation
> of RFC1323 and RFC1644 broken or is ours?  Anyone know of some BSDI 2.0 
> machines that we can test against?

In fact, it fixed the problem most execellently.  I wonder now,
however, what I've lost in performance by having to set that up to
tcp_extensions.