From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 08:40:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A866A106566C; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD748FC0C; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz ([212.24.129.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0N8eE2A057429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:40:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4F1D1CE9.4060401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:40:09 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111021 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: <4F1C897E.1050805@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 212.24.129.198; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: ohauer@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Ports Management Team Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/multimedia/acidrip Makefile ports/math/algotutor Makefile ports/sysutils/apt Makefile ports/graphics/asciio Makefile ports/devel/autodia Makefile ports/www/awffull Makefile ports/devel/bazaar Makefile ports/www/bigbluebutton Mak X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:40:17 -0000 On 2012/01/23 00:35, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Olli Hauer wrote: >> Hm, if I read the diffs Eitan has changed from `=' to `:=' so I think you mean >> Why should we stop using `='? > > A few people on portmgr expressed their preferences that we stop using > both = and := and instead duplicate contents of the variables. Instead > of continuing to guess their reasoning I'll let someone with a hat > reply :) I was expressing my personal preference. No one with the hat is going to force everyone to use one of several equivalently technically correct solutions. Both := and explicit listing are equally fine. -- Pav Lucistnik