From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 19 18:31:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7093937B8C6 for ; Fri, 19 May 2000 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 12sy6s-0004cY-01; Sat, 20 May 2000 03:31:22 +0200 Received: (from naddy@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA51334 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 20 May 2000 01:45:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 01:45:09 +0200 From: Christian Weisgerber To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Removing man page cruft? Message-ID: <20000520014509.A51040@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG - install port foo - view man page foo(1) - remove port - cat man page for foo(1) remains I just wondered why my ssh-keygen(1) man page seemed obsolete. Turns out I still had a cat man page from a long removed OpenSSH port lying around, which was shown by man(1) in preference of the newer man page in the base system. What is the recommended way to get rid of this cruft (and why doesn't this already happen by default)? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message