From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 15 13:40:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB44816A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:40:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from root.netstream-gh.com (core.netstream-gh.com [193.220.176.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24E2C43D1D for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:40:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: (qmail 41242 invoked by uid 414); 15 Jul 2004 13:17:15 +0000 Received: from miha@ghuug.org by root.netstream-gh.com by uid 411 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamdscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:0(192.168.0.3):. Processed in 0.050868 secs); 15 Jul 2004 13:17:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (miha@xuy.biz@192.168.0.3) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Jul 2004 13:17:15 +0000 From: "Mikhail P." Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:40:02 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407151152.16302.miha@ghuug.org> <20040715130859.GB47977@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040715130859.GB47977@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407151340.02270.miha@ghuug.org> cc: Haim Ashkenazi Subject: Re: what version to use for home desktop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:40:12 -0000 On Thursday 15 July 2004 13:08, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Um... no you haven't. =A0If you'ld been tracking -STABLE you'ld probably > have been using 4.10-STABLE. =A0There isn't any 5.x version or code > branch that has been declared STABLE yet -- the 5-STABLE branch is due > to happen with the release of 5.3 in the next few months. =A0Probably. > > Perhaps you've been tracking the 5.2.1-SECURITY branch? Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for confusion/typo. regards, M.