Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 13:12:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu> To: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@muc.de> Cc: "Justin M. Seger" <jseger@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JPEG library version hoses xemacs compile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980421130935.6578H-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199804212005.WAA00158@peedub.muc.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Actually, since the distribution sets it to 62, shouldn't we leave it alone? In my opinion if some other program needs it to be 80 then that program needs to be fixed to match the published jpeg interface. It isn't for us to be changing the version identifiers for somebody elses library. I'm happily xemacsing with it set to 62... -Chris On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > yeah, should be 80 instead of 8. With 80 xemacs compiles OK. > > --- > Gary Jennejohn > Home - garyj@muc.de > Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980421130935.6578H-100000>