Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:02:16 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org>, FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: swap & huge mem systems Message-ID: <20020709125835.Y75130-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020709015454.GA6323@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Erik Trulsson wrote: [snip] ET> Minimal swap if you want to be able to catch core dumps: Physical RAM ET> size + 64K ET> ET> Personally, in your situation I would probably configure enough swap to ET> be able to catch a core dump and not much more, i.e. slightly more than ET> 1G swap. BTW, is it safe to create _interleaved_ swap totally sized slightly above the amount of physical RAM? I mean, is core writer interleve-aware, or does it need the first swap partiton large enough? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020709125835.Y75130-100000>