From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 26 00:19:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6211A2; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053BD1BE3; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1Q0K7hq007637; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:20:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id s1Q0K21f007631; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:20:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from demon.dnswatch.com ([209.180.214.229]) (UDNSMS authenticated user chrish) by ultimatedns.net with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:20:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20140226000421.GA80747@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <47ae4e8ed445c7e6fc46796d46b9a928.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <20140226000421.GA80747@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:20:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: How to prevent use of clang && llvm? From: "Chris H" To: "Brooks Davis" User-Agent: UDNSMS/2.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-hackers , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:19:46 -0000 > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:31:56PM -0800, Chris H wrote: >> Greetings, >> I'm in the process of performing an upgrade, and ran a preliminary check >> to see what would be performed. During the process I encountered a >> dialog(1) for both clang, and llvm3. It was for textproc/clucene. Which >> wants devel/boost-libs, which depends on devel/boost-jam. I didn't require >> clang, or llvm3 with the initial install of textproc/clucene (that I can see/recall). >> But am presented with the dialog this time. I have WITHOUT_CLANG=true >> in /etc/src.conf. Do I need to also add it to /etc/make.conf? Anything else? > > It looks like this is because boots requires a C++11 compiler and the > default C++11 compiler is clang. From reading the source I deduce that > FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc in your make.conf may achieve the effect you > require. You rock! I Really appreciate your taking the time to help. --Chris > > -- Brooks >