From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 28 19:38:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A214106568F for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B01C8FC2D for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-71-245.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.71.245]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1520F1E0B6; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:37:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n8SJb4nR001831; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:37:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:37:03 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Chris Message-Id: <20090928213703.ecf59a9d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090928011444.29110022@chris.makeworld.com> References: <20090928011444.29110022@chris.makeworld.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk Cloning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:38:09 -0000 On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:14:44 -0500, Chris wrote: > Please suggest a cloning method comparable to Clonezilla. For FreeBSD, I'd tend to use dump + restore, because that's their main purpose. > Clonezilla does a nice job with OS's other than *BSD (It uses dd (iirc)) > and that takes forever (at least when cloning - have not tried a > restore). You haven't tried restoring? You should, it's worth it, because what's the value of a backup that cannot be restored? :-) > Some specs I'm using to compare: A typical restore/save currently with > other OS's using CloneZ takes about 12 minutes with a simple boot from > CD. > > The restored/imaged drive is 400 meg sata. Well, dump + restore isn't known for ultimate performance, but its results are good; dd, on the other hand, is another possible way to go. The advantage of dd is that it can be used with any filesystem. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...