From owner-freebsd-standards Fri Sep 6 17:27:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD6237B400; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [65.39.129.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C801643E4A; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@espresso.q9media.com) Received: by espresso.q9media.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2FE779E59; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 20:21:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 20:21:33 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft To: Mike Heffner Cc: Peter Pentchev , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Mike Heffner , Garrett Wollman , "Chris S.J.Peron" , standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: glob(3) in -STABLE: PR bin/42275 Message-ID: <20020906202133.E47192@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20020906222939.GE384@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from mheffner@vt.edu on Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:02:02PM -0400 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Heffner writes: > I would like to go with this option, as I'm sure the problem will come up > again with different programs. However, the lack of the POSIX preprocessor > conditionals in STABLE was currently preventing me. I would like to know > the opinion of those more involved with POSIX conformance. Will the > preprocessor conditionals be MFC'd anytime soon? Or should I MFC the > changes but strip out the conditionals from glob.h? All the C99 and POSIX changes to as safe to MFC. Please feel free to MFC them. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message