Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 08:55:04 -0800 From: "Kevin Sanders" <newroswell@gmail.com> To: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Fabr?cio Barros Cabral <fxcabral@yahoo.com.br> Subject: Re: Intercepting a packet, changing it and re-injecting into the network Message-ID: <375baf50612230855o114c4c32gff314327a0b8a05b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <458C6CDF.4010203@elischer.org> References: <1166802209.7642.17.camel@hades.no-ip.org> <20061222160550.GD47710@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <375baf50612220932m30f84567jdda28b7fc0e62e61@mail.gmail.com> <458C6ACC.2020605@elischer.org> <458C6CDF.4010203@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/22/06, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > > > just as a reference point, > Using ipfw I was able to saturate a Gb bridge > (between 2 bge interfaces) while filtereing against a > table of 128000 addresses. (in FreeBSD 4.8) using 30% cpu.. > machines have gotten faster since then but the OS has slowed a bit. > That's what I'm looking for. Were you using polling or any non-default HZ setting for that? Thanks. Kevin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?375baf50612230855o114c4c32gff314327a0b8a05b>