Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:07:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com> To: "Joel Rees" <rees@ddcom.co.jp> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 release date and stability Message-ID: <1882.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129691239.squirrel@172.16.0.1> In-Reply-To: <F5D52A37-94B5-47FF-A1F5-96A552DAE97E@ddcom.co.jp> References: <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <6.2.3.4.0.20051017202509.0869bc58@64.7.153.2> <6.2.5.6.2.20051017195314.080f90f8@lariat.org> <6.2.3.4.0.20051017215901.045afa88@64.7.153.2> <6.2.5.6.2.20051017215302.07669a20@lariat.org> <1932.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129608301.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <F5D52A37-94B5-47FF-A1F5-96A552DAE97E@ddcom.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, October 18, 2005 10:30 pm, Joel Rees wrote: > >>> How come the kernel is reporting that an AMD chip has HTT? Is this >>> a bug? >>> >> >> No, this is how dual core is reported. >> > > Huh? > > > Don't scare me like that, Mike. I guess i got a little confused here. Before multicore detection code was commited, the processors were detected as hyperthreading. Sorry :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1882.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129691239.squirrel>