Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:12:44 +0100 From: "Max" <max@ecotech.com.lr> To: "Mark Bojara" <mark@mics.co.za> Cc: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Orinoco Ap-500 or OR-500? Message-ID: <007001c236f9$3f7787f0$04ef10ac@wireless> References: <Pine.LNX.4.41.0207291407190.697-100000@opium.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mark, I have taken a look at that, and that's a very cost effective solution. But assuming the situation where the use of a computer is being avoided altogether, then, which is the better choice? Max ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Bojara" <mark@mics.co.za> To: "Max" <max@ecotech.com.lr> Cc: <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: Re: Orinoco Ap-500 or OR-500? > Greetings Max, > > Get a PCMCIA Orinocco Wireless card and set it up on a FreeBSD server to > act as a Access Point. Please check the URL below for detailed > information. > > http://www.samag.com/documents/s=7121/sam0205a/sam0205a.htm > > Regards > Mark Bojara > MICS Online - 012-661-999 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > And he disappeared in a puff of logic. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Max wrote: > > >I am look for a solution for my remote stations. I have a wireless backbone beaming across the clients and they have their lans already in place. My task is to connect their lans to the backbone wirelessly. My question is: what's the best choice (efficiency and cost-wise) for connectiing them? Do I use a Orinoco AP-500 or OR-500? Formerly i was using a gateway machine Win2000 Server/Win2K Pro and WinXP. > > > >Thanks > > > >Max > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?007001c236f9$3f7787f0$04ef10ac>