From owner-freebsd-net Mon Nov 16 06:13:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA14039 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 06:13:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (arthur.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.5.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA14022 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 06:13:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk) Received: from rambo (actually rambo.futures.bt.co.uk) by arthur (local) with SMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:12:07 +0000 Received: from maczebedee (actually macsmtp) by rambo with SMTP (PP); Mon, 16 Nov 1998 14:13:17 +0000 Message-ID: Date: 16 Nov 1998 14:10:09 +0100 From: Graeme Brown Subject: Is there a device which provides an IP-in-IP tunnel interface which is visible to routing ? To: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.0.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear List Can anyone enlighten me as how I can install an IP-in-IP tunnel between two FreeBSD boxes such that the tunnel end points effectively look like network interfaces which routing protocols such as routed will see. I am aware of the tunnel driver giving tun0, tun1 interfaces to be used with PPP dialup lines. However can tun interfaces be used more generally for things other than PPP dialup lines. Is there any other means to configure an IP-in-IP tunnel interface ? TIA Graeme Brown BT Labs, UK email: graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message