From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 27 16:23:43 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA24240 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:23:43 -0800 Received: from isl.cf.ac.uk (isl-gate.elsy.cf.ac.uk [131.251.22.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA24234; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 16:23:40 -0800 Received: (from paul@localhost) by isl.cf.ac.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id AAA28146; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:22:19 GMT From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199502280022.AAA28146@isl.cf.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD To: julian@tfs.com (Julian Elischer) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 00:22:18 +0000 (GMT) Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: from "Julian Elischer" at Feb 27, 95 02:15:49 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 664 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Julian Elischer who said > > > > > > Just to re-iterate, my suggestion is to (a) make ld.so compatible and > > > > > This suggest that we have a /usr/shlib/NetBSD > which would be good because it would fit in with the > /usr/shlib/iBSC2-SCO > and > /usr/shlib/Linux > that are already coming down the pipeline. > we could then have: > /usr/shlib/FreeBSD-1 for the compat stuff. > I like this plan. -- Paul Richards, FreeBSD core team member. Phone: +44 1222 874000 x6646 (work), +44 1222 457651 (home) Dept. Mechanical Engineering, University of Wales, College Cardiff. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, JANET(UK): RICHARDSDP@CARDIFF.AC.UK