From owner-cvs-all  Thu Feb  6  8:21:33 2003
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0613B37B401; Thu,  6 Feb 2003 08:21:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out8.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (out8.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net [169.207.3.117])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7434A43FB1; Thu,  6 Feb 2003 08:21:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from [10.1.1.6] (d149.as29.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.73.151])
	by out8.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 090113C053; Thu,  6 Feb 2003 10:21:28 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:29:56 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>
Cc: Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org>,
	Mike Silbersack <silby@FreeBSD.ORG>, "" <all-committers@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	"" <legacy-committers@FreeBSD.ORG>, "" <cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT access.ports
In-Reply-To: <20030206153731.GA620@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
Message-ID: <20030206102851.C34919-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
References: <200302060712.h167ChJF031957@repoman.freebsd.org>   
 <86ptq5pyqe.wl%knu@iDaemons.org> <20030206153731.GA620@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David Schultz wrote:

> Thus spake Akinori MUSHA <knu@iDaemons.org>:
> > At Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:12:43 -0800 (PST),
> > Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > > silby       2003/02/05 23:12:43 PST
> > >
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     .                    access.ports
> > >   Log:
> > >   If this is the file where people who work in ports are listed,
> > >   why is it not called access.sailors?
> >
> > And access.engineers for those who work in docs? :)
>
> Sure, just as long as you guys don't call a docworker strike and
> demand high-percentage wage increases, better working conditions,
> etc.

I wasn't supposed to tell anyone this, but I hear that -core is calling in
some union busting consultants next month.  This access list split is just
the beginning; soon it will be longer hours with fewer pay for all
committers!

Mike "Silby" Silbersack

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message