From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Jul 2 13:53:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9D115D3EB6; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:53:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803C986BFA; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:53:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A719F16E81; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 13:53:43 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , Piotr Kubaj , Greg Lewis , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r505640 - head/java/openjdk11 Message-ID: <20190702135343.GB17473@lonesome.com> References: <201907012118.x61LIIQr011692@repo.freebsd.org> <20190702072450.GA17073@KGPE-D16> <20190702082607.GA45590@FreeBSD.org> <20190702083515.seykaqqjd77zyyr2@ivaldir.net> <20190702104415.GB59302@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190702104415.GB59302@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 803C986BFA X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.90 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.904,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 13:53:46 -0000 On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:44:15AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Right; unfortunately, often people who commit these changes do not > bother to check with the actual code to see if a different/better > solution is available (or even in order). Sigh. Yes, I'm sure that I could first do tests with c89, then whatever failed, try again with c99, then try c11, then try again with c++11-lang, then ... etc. etc. Or I could carefully read the code of each port I'm trying to fix. OTOH I would like to have powerpc64 ports usable before FreeBSD-19 comes out. fwiw the stats on built packages: Mon Nov 19 13:48:26 UTC 2018 16485 Sun Jun 16 06:10:04 UTC 2019 27953 I'm not even going to try to look up the number of build tests and commits involved in getting us to this point. Hint: the former is not the hundreds, it's in the thousands. mcl