From owner-freebsd-audit Thu Mar 1 8:16:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363DC37B719 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 08:16:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f21GGSd49414; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:16:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200103011616.f21GGSd49414@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: Propagating the nodump flag Cc: Dima Dorfman , audit@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Mar 2001 14:30:30 +0100." References: <20010301041234.9F3D63E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 09:16:28 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : 1) does our dump(8) have useful functionality that NetBSD's doesn't? : 2) does NetBSD's dump(8) have useful functionality that ours doesn't? : : If the answers to these questions are "no" and "yes" respectively, as : I suspect they may be, we should just replace our dump(8) with : NetBSD's. If the answers are "yes" and "yes", we should merge : evrything NetBSD's dump(8) does that ours doesn't into our dump(8) and : strive to keep the diffs between the two as small as possible. I have changes to our dump that uses wall -g rather than making it setgid. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message