Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:26:05 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Charles Sprickman <spork@fasttrackmonkey.com> Cc: tjr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 Message-ID: <20050108202605.GA30807@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0501081320080.603@oof.local> References: <41DE4F3D.8050509@syskonnect.de> <20050107091004.83732.qmail@web52710.mail.yahoo.com> <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net> <20050108135526.GQ49329@submonkey.net> <Pine.OSX.4.61.0501081320080.603@oof.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:21:14PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: > Any idea what type of impact this patch would have on say, a large qmail > server that's drowning in context-switches? It will depend on how many processes you have running at any one moment and how often processes are created/destroyed. From the look of the graphs, you won't really be able to tell unless there are significantly more than 1000 processes running at any moment. David.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050108202605.GA30807>