Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Mar 1998 11:12:12 -0600 (CST)
From:      Tim Salo <salo@networkcs.com>
To:        reddawg@shellz.malicia.com
Cc:        freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: OC3
Message-ID:  <199803311712.LAA07876@us.networkcs.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 16:20:14 -0500 (EST)
> From: Christopher <reddawg@shellz.malicia.com>
> To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu>
> cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: OC3
> 
> Im not sure im new to atm i do know on the other end will be a cisco and
> im not sure what that would use over the atm.
> 
> > >  How would i go about making a freebsd box into an oc3 router that would
> > >  take place of a cisco?

You, in some sense, need to ensure that both devices agree on what protocol
to use at each layer in the protocol stack.

Perhaps,

o	ATM: PVCs or SVCs, UNI 3.0/3.1 SVCs versus (maybe/unlikely) UNI 4.0

o	AAL: AAL5 is typical, but at least one ATM DSU uses only AAL3/4,
	(don't use that ADSU...)

o	Encapsulation:  LLC/SNAP is typical, but sometimes null encapsulation
	is used.  Some odd devices, perhaps some ADSUs, might use NLPID
	encapsulation.  (FR/ATM interworking devices might use NLPID;
	I don't know, I have never seen one.) See RFC 1483.

o	IP/ATM Convergence Sublayer (does this stuff have name): The
	two major choices are IETF Classical IP (RFC 1577) and ATM Forum
	LANE (LAN emulation).  The two standards (or, is that "standards"?)
	don't interoperate.  Some software supports one but not the
	other.  This is probably the most important protocol choice to
	ensure that you get right.

o	IP/ATM Short-Cut Sublayer (I am pretty sure this doesn't have
	a name.)  The IETF says NHRP while the ATM Forum says MPOA.
	This shouldn't be an issue for you; I included it just for the
	sake of completeness.  (The IETF and the ATM Forum say MPOA and
	NHRP interoperate.  I wonder if anyone has tried.)

If you get this far, your higher layers should be no problem.

I believe that you will be (far) better off if the Cisco router on the
other end has a native ATM interface (e.g., an AIP card) rather than
a HSSI interface with an external ATM DSU.  (Details available on
request, I suppose.  Someday I should finish writing the whole story...)

-tjs

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803311712.LAA07876>