From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Sep 18 23:16:51 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA10048 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 23:16:51 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA10042 ; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 23:16:49 -0700 Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA03449; Mon, 18 Sep 1995 23:15:59 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199509190615.XAA03449@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: why is this not a bug in namei? To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 23:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Cc: davidg@root.com, terry@lambert.org, julian@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199509190326.UAA09176@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 18, 95 08:26:10 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 675 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > hate the spaghetti of goto's that I've seen with your code. ok ok ok.. can we quit on the character assasination here? ok, so we know some people don't like Terry's style.. ok, so what.. if he produces a useful piece of code we can still use it.. I've seen bits of core in other people's code I don't like, and people have taken such a dislike to my code that they've totally reformatted it.. ok, now can we all take a deep breath and stop quibbling? if terry writes code, and it works, we can use it. anyone is permited to rewrite it if they want.. terry might get annoyed, but it's permitted.. it's not as if we are actually short of things to do or anything..