From owner-soc-status@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 28 13:44:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: soc-status@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A2A106566C; Mon, 28 May 2012 13:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbjcalmels@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871268FC15; Mon, 28 May 2012 13:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so4845778pbb.13 for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 06:44:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ikciu+gi8+LlwB7I7InqDPeSpiBLGbk6bLIpASoKC2U=; b=PJg3pcrA+Qem/YW7ac9wfV/M52UGE/mm0uY3dW0X7L9kMTCw5DDnC2RbQ0dNhX9ONb P37yC5kiho5VtCfSzuYy8O4AgqKtTa5MvVdmu0x2vvi3CCUz/pw/dJffYZtScp7AueoG 6CtGYEAPaPTC5p1t2N0LPVTyTFIVnAy3fZGwIcUXes8Ekz2ItucvSjP3EsJv1D18leAS 0xWTHKxK8NqD4rEi7PVe0XD8dU6T4R+YmiJGe8pjdL6EyTaqJS2jfj4zTioyB4iT2hG8 sfrK9vZcvvpfjb8BZaLeGFzS8i891OFkQYxpbsyoi22+ifrGKhTWmEgWJpmDuTqAtYyk mouw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.221.98 with SMTP id qd2mr24787433pbc.3.1338212673064; Mon, 28 May 2012 06:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.70.21 with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2012 06:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 15:44:33 +0200 Message-ID: From: Jonathan Calmels To: soc-status@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: [Week 1][IPv6 Improvement] Activity report X-BeenThere: soc-status@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Summer of Code Status Reports and Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 13:44:33 -0000 Hi everyone, Here is my report for the week concerning the IPv6 improvement, under Bjoern Zeeb's mentoring. I worked on the support of IPv6 on CVS while using it in pserver mode. A fully functional patch has been committed and right now I insure that no problems arise depending on the network stack used. Indeed I'm currently writing some regression test to test the following situations : - Host involving a dual stack network (inet4/inet6) with inet6 fully configured - Host involving a dual stack network (inet4/inet6) without inet6 configured - Host including inet6 only I also started looking at "who" and "openssl" and reflect on a possible IPv6 implementation which should come in the next few days by now. I apologize for this slow start but I had to finish configuring my IPv6 testbed. Nevertheless, I plan to catch up that delay as soon as possible. Regards,