From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 08:34:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D205216A4BF for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pony1pub.arc.nasa.gov (pony1pub.arc.nasa.gov [128.102.31.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED08343FCB for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:34:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jtoung@arc.nasa.gov) Received: from nren-194.arc.nasa.gov ([128.102.196.194] verified) by pony1pub.arc.nasa.gov (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 2214994; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:34:01 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Jerry Toung To: Paolo Pisati , Diomidis Spinellis , Ping Pan , Lars Eggert , Bruce M Simpson Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:33:29 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200308191602.40166.jtoung@arc.nasa.gov> <20030820120719.GA1255@newluxor.skynet.org> In-Reply-To: <20030820120719.GA1255@newluxor.skynet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200308200833.29553.jtoung@arc.nasa.gov> cc: FreeBSD_Hackers Subject: Re: new routing protocol X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jtoung@arc.nasa.gov List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:34:03 -0000 Thank you all for the inputs, this should get me started faster. Jerry. On Wednesday 20 August 2003 05:07 am, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:02:40PM -0700, Jerry Toung wrote: > > My problem is dealing with debuging and portability. With this raw > > approach I guess I will have to run builkernel and installkernel all = the > > time. How can I avoid that? I thought about kernel modules, but I don= 't > > know what kind to use (SYSCALL_MODULE or DEV_MODULE,etc..) and how ab= out > > netgraph.? does that make sense? > > i'm implementing a packet classification algorithm in FreeBSD using > the Netgraph nodes, and i would reccomend you to do the same: > > writing a netgraph node is really simple (after you crash > your os serveral times... =3D), and you can > plug/unplug your code at any time without > the need to reboot. >