Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:37:54 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 199872] devel/glib20  Apps using glib 2.42.2 crashing with 'pthread_mutex_lock' abort
Message-ID:  <bug-199872-6497-83aQnywwtH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199872-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-199872-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199872

lightside <lightside@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #189330|maintainer-approval?(gnome@ |
              Flags|FreeBSD.org)                |
 Attachment #189330|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #189354|                            |maintainer-approval?(gnome@
              Flags|                            |FreeBSD.org)

--- Comment #27 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> ---
Created attachment 189354
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D189354&action=
=3Dedit
Proposed patch for options (since 453790 revision)

(In reply to comment #26)
Need to note, that proposed (INOTIFY and KQUEUE) port's options allows to
switch between gio/inotify and gio/kqueue (affected) implementations. I'm
aware, that devel/libinotify port is for "Kevent based inotify compatible
library" (i.e. also uses kqueue; see comment #11). Possible to clarify
descriptions for port's options.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199872-6497-83aQnywwtH>