Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:22:07 +0100 From: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r307554 - in head: archivers/pear-Horde_Compress databases/pear-Horde_Db deskutils/horde4-groupware deskutils/horde4-kronolith deskutils/horde4-mnemo deskutils/horde4-nag devel/pear-Hor... Message-ID: <50AA084F.6050408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50A9FBBB.8020007@yandex.ru> References: <201211190802.qAJ821XP013771@svn.freebsd.org> <50A9FBBB.8020007@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19. 11. 2012 10:28, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Martin Matuska wrote on 19.11.2012 12:02: >> Author: mm >> Date: Mon Nov 19 08:02:01 2012 >> New Revision: 307554 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/307554 >> >> Log: >> horde4 update: >> >> archivers/pear-Horde_Compress 1.0.7 -> 1.0.8 >> databases/pear-Horde_Db 1.2.1 -> 1.2.2 >> deskutils/horde4-groupware 4.0.8 -> 4.0.9 > > [...] > > Does this commit conform with feature freeze rules? And if yes, can I > commit similar plone-ports update (many ports)? > > And one more question: couple of days ago I started receiving updates > into /usr/ports/LASTCOMMIT.txt - is it ok, or some debug was forgotten > to be disabled? > > Thanks. > This commit is just a bundle of several individual simple updates, it doesn't touch any dependencies outside horde4 nor add any new features. E.g a update to horde5 would probably not be feature safe - so I have to wait until 9.1. I have no knowledge of the plone ports so I can't judge if it is a feature-safe update or not. -- Martin Matuska FreeBSD committer http://blog.vx.sk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50AA084F.6050408>