From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec  9 09:29:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA17584
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 09:29:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from tgn2.tgn.net (root@tgn2.tgn.net [205.241.85.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA17556
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 09:28:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from gemohler@tgn2.tgn.net)
Received: (from gemohler@localhost)
	by tgn2.tgn.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA20296;
	Tue, 9 Dec 1997 11:27:53 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 11:27:53 -0600 (CST)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@tgn2.tgn.net>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Namei cache?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971209112556.20195A-100000@tgn2.tgn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Did there used to be a directive for configuring the kernel to hav a 
large(r) namei cache?

I thought I saw this around 2.1.5 (or so) in the LINT file, and it really 
beefed up the speed of my INN server.

Ive got my CCD running great at 64k interleave, with -i2048 -c16 as flags 
to newfs.

Im just wondering where that one directive went off to.

Thanks.